<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Korean labor law &#187; rules of employment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/tag/rules-of-employment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com</link>
	<description>iNformation on laws and systems of Korean labor relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Probationary period</title>
		<link>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/probationary-period/</link>
		<comments>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/probationary-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[labor laws and systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules of employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The probationary period, here, means a period that a company, after concluding a labor contract with a worker, sets a certain period of time to assess the worker&#8217;s aptitude for his job, train him to get familiar with the job, and etc. </p>
<p>Incidentally, the Labor Standards Act of Korea does not have an explicit regulation on <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/probationary-period/">Probationary period</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The probationary period, here, means a period that a company, after concluding a labor contract with a worker, sets a certain period of time to assess the worker&#8217;s aptitude for his job, train him to get familiar with the job, and etc. <span id="more-75"></span></p>
<p>Incidentally, the Labor Standards Act of Korea does not have an explicit regulation on this matter. </p>
<p>The only article that mentions a probationary worker is the article 35 of the act.</p>
<p><strong>Article 35 of the LSA</strong></p>
<p>In the event of dismissal of an employee with any of the following status of employment, <strong>the employer is not obliged to give a 30-day notice.</strong></p>
<p>- Daily employees who have not worked for a 3 consecutive months<br />
- Employees hired for a pre-arranged period of time lasting 2 months or less<br />
- Salary employees who have worked for less than 6 months<br />
- Employees hired for seasonal work for a pre-arranged period of time lasting 6 months or less<br />
<strong>- Employees under probationary period (of 3 months or less)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Most companies in Korea,</strong> based on this article, regulates in their rules of employment or individual labor contracts that probationary period shall be<strong> 3 months. </strong></p>
<p><strong>1. What about making the period longer than 3 months? </strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Again, no relevant article in labor law. </span></strong></p>
<p>However, an administrative interpretation by the Ministry of Labor says that the length of a probationary period is not restricted to 3 months but <strong>can be longer than 3 months  on the basis of nature of jobs and within reasonable bound. </strong>(February 9, 1993/Geungi 01254-221)</p>
<p>The interpretation also advises companies to have a relevant article in the collective bargaining agreement or the rules of employment. </p>
<p><strong>2. What about renewing or extending the probationary period? </strong></p>
<p>As can be expected, there is no mention on this matter in the law. Just an administrative interpretation by the ministry that<strong> extending the probationary period is not against law. </strong>(October 10, 1991 / Geungi 01254-14914) </p>
<p>The conclusion is that an employer can decide on the length of probationary period as long as he/she considers it necessary for the purpose of assessing and training the worker but within the limit as can be reasonable and that such period should be stipulated in labor contracts, rules of employment to prevent any debate between a worker and a company. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/probationary-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rules of employment for a workplace with 10 or more workers</title>
		<link>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/rules-of-employment-for-a-workplace-with-10-or-more-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/rules-of-employment-for-a-workplace-with-10-or-more-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[labor laws and systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules of employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Labor Standards Act (LSA), a workplace hiring 10 or more workers should draw up rules of employment and submit them to the Ministry of Labor.</p>
<p>The rules of employment (ROE) as required by the LSA mean not only a single document. Even separate rules about wage, bonus or benefits are considered as the ROE <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/rules-of-employment-for-a-workplace-with-10-or-more-workers/">Rules of employment for a workplace with 10 or more workers</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Labor Standards Act (LSA), a workplace hiring 10 or more workers should draw up rules of employment and submit them to the Ministry of Labor.<span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>The rules of employment (ROE) as required by the LSA mean not only a single document. Even separate rules about wage, bonus or benefits are considered as the ROE as long as they deal with terms of employment that govern all workers in a workplace.</p>
<p>The LSA states the following matters as mandatory items that should be included in the ROE.</p>
<p>1.  starting and finishing time of work, recess hours, holidays, leaves and shifts<br />
2. determination of wages, calculation of wages, means of payment, closing of payment, time of payment and wage increase<br />
3. calculation of family allowances and means of payment<br />
4. retirement<br />
5. severance pay, bonuses and minimum wages<br />
6. meal allowance and allocation of expenses for operational tools or necessities<br />
7. educational facility for workers<br />
8. maternity protection of female workers, such as maternity leave, childcare leave and work and life balance<br />
9. safety and health<br />
10. improvement of workplace environment to accomodate gender, age and physical conditions of workers<br />
11. support pertaining occupational or non-occupational accidents<br />
12. award and punishment<br />
13. other matters applicable to all workers of the business concerned</p>
<p>An employer has a right to draw up the ROE. However, the LSA asks the employer to comply with certain procedures for drawing up or amending the ROE. Failure to follow these procedures does not invalidate the ROE but will result in a fine for the employer.  However, failure to obtain consent of workers for disadvantageous amendment makes the ROE ineffective as shown below.</p>
<p>First, the employer should obtain the <strong>opinion </strong>of a majority union or majority of workers when a majority union does not exist with regard to the ROE. He should attach a document showing such opinion to the ROE when he submit them to the Ministry of Labor. He should do the same when he amends the ROE.  </p>
<p>Second, when the amendments made to the ROE are <strong>disadvantageous</strong> to workers compared to existing ROE, the employer should obtain <strong>consent</strong> of majority union or majority of workers. </p>
<p>What is the definition of disadvantageous amendment of the ROE? For example, removing certain allowances and bonuses or reducing the number of holidays may be considered as disadvantageous to workers. However, whether an amendment of the ROE is disadvantageous or not should be determined based on the consideration of the ROE as a whole, not by focusing on individual items.</p>
<p>What if an employer fails to obtain consent of workers for disadvantageous amendment? The amended ROE become ineffective for the workers who did not give consent. For such workers, the ROE before amendment are still effective. However, the amended ROE apply to new workers who joined a company later on after accepting the amended ROE.</p>
<p>Recently, the Ministry of Labor made an English translation of standard ROE. To read the translation, download <a title="See pages 206 to 208" href="http://www.koilaf.org/KFupload/kfpublication_file/6_187~208.PDF" target="_blank">this file</a> and <a title="See Pages 209 to 233" href="http://www.koilaf.org/KFupload/kfpublication_file/7_209~248.PDF" target="_blank">this one</a>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/rules-of-employment-for-a-workplace-with-10-or-more-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On 40 hour workweek of Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/on-40-hour-workweek-of-korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/on-40-hour-workweek-of-korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[labor laws and systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annual leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules of employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p id="gdue">Korea began to adopt 40 hour workweek from July 1st, 2004 based on the revised Labor Standards Act (LSA). The revised law, in order to alleviate possible increase in cost for employer, determined a gradual schedule for implementation of 40 hour workweek depending on the size of companies rather than applying the system to every <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/on-40-hour-workweek-of-korea/">On 40 hour workweek of Korea</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="eh7y" class="entry-content">
<p id="gdue">Korea began to adopt 40 hour workweek from July 1st, 2004 based on <a id="f7l-" title="full text of the labor standards act in pdf format" href="http://english.molab.go.kr/data/LaborStandardsAct.pdf" target="_blank">the revised Labor Standards Act (LSA). </a>The revised law, in order to alleviate possible increase in cost for employer, determined <strong id="xas5">a gradual schedule for implementation of 40 hour workweek</strong> depending on the size of companies rather than applying the system to every company at the same time.   <span id="more-6"></span><br id="c4u3" />According to the schedule, companies with 1,000 or more employees were the first to adopt the system. Since then, the system gradually applied to smaller companies every year. <strong id="c:te">This year, companies with 20 or more workers should adopt the system from July 1st.</strong> Companies with less than 20 employees should introduce the system at an appropriate time until 2011. The specific date for companies with less than 20 workers has yet to be decided.   <br id="mycz" /> <br id="fc_u" />40 hour workweek not only reduces working hours but also brings changes in arrangement of leave and overtime pays.</p>
<p id="mgj3"><strong id="r7x9">1. Reduction of working hours</strong>   <br id="qh0z" /> <br id="f:-d" />Before the revision of the LSA, legal working hours was 8 hours a day and 44 hours a week. With the new system, it is <strong id="ot63">8 hours a day and 40 hours a week</strong>.  What does the legal working hours mean? In terms of cost, it simply means that any work done outside legal working hours should be compensated as overtime work.   <br id="eqg:" /> <br id="t82o" /><strong id="lfiu">2. Overtime</strong>   <br id="vzel" /> <br id="os5-" /><strong id="bt4c">Maximum overtime hours</strong>   <br id="sagr" /> <br id="ds1o" />With an exception of some industries such as transportation, sale, telecommunication, research, advertising and etc, maximum overtime hours per week is <strong id="bw5d">12 hours</strong>. For overtime, an employer should pay an employee <strong id="cl9x">150% of ordinary wage</strong>. Ordinary wage, one of the complicated concepts for both Korean and foreign employers, can be roughly understood as wage including base pay and fixed allowances.   <br id="l7km" /> <br id="e6.0" /><strong id="p:7l">Reduced overtime pay rate   <br id="bdyz" /></strong> <br id="t28a" />During debates on introduction of 40 hour workweek, many employers expressed concern about possible increase in overtime pay because of reduced legal working hours. As a response to the concern, the revised law determined that <strong id="qvhd">125% </strong>of ordinary wage should be paid for the <strong id="lwtm">first 4 hour of overtime work. </strong>However, such reduced rate is effective only for three years after the adoption of 40 hour workweek.   <br id="odv3" /> <br id="n_mg" /><strong id="zmao">Compensation time-off   </strong><br id="cizu" /> <br id="clm2" />Under 40 hour workweek, workers can use leave instead of receiving overtime pay. This is almost the same as compensation time off in the United States except that time of leave (or time-off) should match the rate of overtime pay.  While compensation time-off of the US allows 1 hour of time off to a worker for one hour of overtime, the Korean system requires <strong id="dq33">one-and-half hour of time off for one hour of overtime</strong>.   <br id="q.:." /> <br id="p7uc" /><strong id="w_8o">3. Annual leave</strong>   <br id="xhqz" /> <br id="dzd." /><strong id="u5yj">Number of days of leave   </strong><br id="at4e" /> <br id="tmj2" />Under the 44 hour workweek, workers had two kinds of leave, namely monthly leave and annual leave. One day of monthly leave was given for one month of work, and 10 days of annual leave were given to a worker after he completed one year of work. There was also 1 day of additional leave for every year starting from the third year of continued service. There was no limit to the number of days of annual leave that increased as workers continued to work.   <br id="rzjv" /> <br id="rukq" />With 40 hour workweek, a worker can have <strong id="d8.8">15 days of annual leave</strong> from the second year on the condition that he worked 80 percent of working days of the first year. Starting from the fourth year, one day is added to the 15 days of leave. Since then, one day of leave is added to the annual leave every two years. The maximum number of days of annual leave is 25.   <br id="x6_e" /> <br id="jwf5" />The new working hour system abolished monthly leave. As a result, <strong id="b8vi">a worker in his first year </strong>of service may not have any leave. To solve this problem, the LSA stipulated that <strong id="repr">1 day of leave </strong>should be given <strong id="g83z">for every month </strong>as long as a worker worked a full month. Such leave used in the first year should be subtracted from 15 days of annual leave that take place in the second year.   <br id="lbjt" /> <br id="xn8y" /><strong id="l4r0">Compensation for unused annual leave   </strong> <br id="om-x" /> <br id="t0ne" />This is one of the problems that foreign employers who just started doing business in Korea often complain about. Once a worker is entitled to annual leave based on his work of the previous year, he can use the leave for a one-year period. What happens if he did not use up all his annual leave? An employer should make <strong id="s86j">a monetary compensation for the unused leave </strong>at the first day of the third year. However, there is no mention about this compensation in the text of the Labor Standards Act. The compensation is based on <strong id="bdv3">court rulings and labor ministry’s guidelines</strong>. Though foreign employers complain that they find no explicit regulation on such compensation in the labor law, this compensation has been a fixed practice.  <br id="bpcn" /> <br id="l7:i" />The revised LSA offers a solution of this problem for employers. If an employer gives <strong id="l9.x">notice to a worker about three months before the expiry of annual leave</strong>, which would be usually the end of every year, he doesn’t have to compensate for the unused leave.  <br id="ni4l" /> <br id="xazw" /><strong id="aj40">Menstruation leave   </strong><br id="x5bn" /> <br id="e27d" />Under 44 hour workweek, a female worker had one day of paid menstruation leave for every month. The new system retained the leave but made it <strong id="guwt">unpaid leave</strong>.  <br id="ymd2" /> <br id="frme" /> <br id="vuue" /><strong id="d4d:">4. Amendment of the rules of employment</strong>     <br id="bya7" /> <br id="tere" />Rules of employment (ROE) are mandatory documents to be made by an employer to specify working conditions of workers. Major contents of rules of employment are wage, working hours, leave, discipline, benefits and other working conditions. <strong id="k82e">Any company with 10 or more employees </strong>is required by the LSA to make rules of employment. When it has made rules of employment, the company should submit the ROE to the Ministry of Labor with a written opinion of majority of workers.  <br id="gm5q" /> <br id="lw:l" />The LSA says that when a company introduces 40 hour workweek, it should <strong id="klki">amend the ROE in line with changes </strong>resulting from the new system and submit the ROE along with <strong id="f6eg">written opinion of majority of workers </strong>to the Ministry of Labor. Incidentally, if working conditions stated in the ROE are more <strong id="k9uq">unfavorable </strong>to workers than previous ones, <strong id="fpth">written consents</strong>, not opinions, of workers are required.</p>
<p id="wwwy">The Ministry of Labor had stated its position that if 40 hour workweek was adopted with no changes made to the conditions stated in the LSA, such introduction of the new system cannot be deemed unfavorable change of working condition. In that case, written opinions of workers are sufficient. As for companies with a labor union, they should amend a collective agreement through collective bargaining to apply 40 hour workweek to union members.  <br id="uuzh" /> <br id="w9_7" /></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.koreanlaborlaw.com/on-40-hour-workweek-of-korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
